超临界CO2萃取致密砂砾岩中原油效果影响因素实验研究

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2021.06.007

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to improve the oil recovery of tight sandy conglomerate reservoir, the tight oil in the tight glutenite core is extracted by the supercritical CO₂ based on the reservoir conditions of Mahu tight sandy conglomerate reservoir in Xinjiang. And then, four production parameters affecting tight oil extraction, which are the pressure（7~25 MPa）, the temperature（30~60 ℃）, the soaking time（30~180 min） and the cycle time（30~180 min）, have been optimized and analyzed by the single factor analysis method. The results show that the supercritical CO₂ can extract the crude oil from the tight glutenite with relatively good effects, and the extraction rate can reach up to 25.22 %. By the orthogonal design experiment L₉（3⁴） with four factors and three levels for the above four production parameters, it is found that the factors influencing the extraction effect of crude oil by supercritical CO₂ have primary and secondary order: pressure > immersion time > temperature > circulating time. The optimal parameter scheme is the pressure of 25 MPa, tht temperature of 50 ℃, the soaking time of 120 min, and the cyclic time of 150 min. The application of CO₂ to extract crude oil in tight glutenite reservoirs has good application prospects.

Key words: supercritical CO₂, extraction, tight sandy conglomerate reservoir, extraction rate, influence factor

CLC Number:

TE357

Haisheng HU,Yang GAO,Jiangtao SHAN, et al. Experimental researches on factors influencing supercritical CO₂ extraction effect of crude oil from tight sandy conglomerate[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(6): 845-851.

Figures/Tables 22

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Table 1

Table 2

Fig. 5

Table 3

Table 4

Fig. 6

Table 5

Table 6

Fig. 7

Table 7

Table 8

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Table 9

Table 10

Table 11

Table 12

Table 13

References 23

[1]	何云超, 张崇瑞. 新疆准噶尔盆地发现世界储量最大的砾岩油田[J]. 中国地质, 2017, 44(6):1174.
	HE Yunchao, ZHANG Chongrui. The world’s largest conglomerate oil field discovered in Junggar Basin, Xinjiang[J]. Geology in China, 2017, 44(6):1174.
[2]	高嘉. 油藏二氧化碳驱提高采收率及埋存技术[J]. 中国石油石化, 2017, 15(5):29-30.
	GAO Jia. Enhanced oil recovery and storage technology by CO₂ flooding in reservoir[J]. China Petrochem, 2017, 15(5):29-30.
[3]	杨铁军, 张英芝, 杨正明, 等. 致密砂岩油藏CO₂驱油提高采收率机理[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2019, 19(24):113-118.
	YANG Tiejun, ZHANG Yingzhi, YANG Zhengming, et al. Mechanism of enhanced oil recovery by CO₂ flooding in tight sandstone reservoirs[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2019, 19(24):113-118.
[4]	白玉彬, 罗静兰, 王少飞, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地吴堡地区延长组长8致密砂岩油藏成藏主控因素[J]. 中国地质, 2013, 40(4):1159-1168.
	BAI Yubin, LUO Jinglan, WANG Shaofei, et al. The distribution of chang-8 tight sandstone oil reservoir of yanchang formation in wubao area, central-south of ordos basin[J]. Geology in China, 2013, 40(4):1159-1168.
[5]	TANG M M, ZHAO H Y, MA H F, et al. Study on CO₂ huff-n-puff of horizontal wells in continental tight oil reservoirs[J]. Fuel, 2017, 188:140-154. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.10.027
[6]	ZHANG X, WEI B, SHANG J, et al. Alterations of geochemical properties of a tight sandstone reservoir caused by supercritical CO₂-brine-rock interactions in CO₂-EOR and geosequestration[J]. Journal of CO₂ Utilization, 2018, 28:408-418.
[7]	许琳, 常秋生, 冯玲丽, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组页岩油储层特征及控制因素[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5):649-660.
	XU Lin, CHANG Qiusheng, FENG Lingli, et al. The reservoir characteristics and control factors of shale oil in Permian Fengcheng Formation of Mahu sag, Junggar Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5):649-660.
[8]	李孟涛, 单文文, 刘先贵, 等. 超临界二氧化碳混相驱油机理实验研究[J]. 石油学报, 2006, 27(3):80-83.
	LI Mengtao, SHAN Wenwen, LIU Xiangui, et al. Laboratory study on miscible oil displacement mechanism of supercritical carbon dioxide[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2006, 27(3):80-83.
[9]	王强, 李志明, 钱门辉, 等. 超临界二氧化碳萃取泥页岩中可动油实验研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(4):646-652.
	WANG Qiang, LI Zhiming, QIAN Menhui, et al. Movable oil extraction from shale with supercritical carbon dioxide[J]. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2020, 42(4):646-652.
[10]	PENG X Y, WENG Y Y, DIAO Y Q, et al. Experimental investigation on the operation parameters of carbon dioxide huff-n-puff process in ultra low permeability oil reservoirs[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2019, 174:903-912. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2018.11.073
[11]	马铨峥, 杨胜来, 陈浩, 等. 致密油储集层CO₂吞吐效果及影响因素分析——以新疆吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组为例[J]. 石油科学通报, 2018, 3(4):434-445.
	MA Quanzheng, YANG Shenglai, CHEN hao, et al. Effect and influencing factors of CO₂ huff and puff in a tight oil reservoir——Taking the Lucaogou formation in the Xinjiang Jimsar sag as an example[J]. Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2018, 3(4):434-445.
[12]	杨胜来, 杭达震, 孙蓉, 等. CO₂对原油的抽提及其对原油黏度的影响[J]. 中国石油大学学报:自然科学版, 2009, 1(4):85-88.
	YANG Shenglai, HANG Dazheng, SUN Rong, et al. CO₂ extraction for crude oil and its effect on crude oil viscosity[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum, 2009, 1(4):85-88.
[13]	王鉴, 张楠, 武芹, 等. 超临界CO₂溶解性能的研究进展[J]. 炼油与化工, 2011, 22(5):1-5.
	WANG Jian, ZHANG Nan, WU Qin, et al. Research progress on the solubility of supercritical CO₂[J]. Refining and Chemical Industry, 2011, 22(5):1-5.
[14]	张航国. 金南油田致密油藏CO₂提高采收率物理模拟研究[J]. 石化技术, 2018, 25(4):269-270.
	ZHANG Hangguo. Physical simulation of CO₂ enhanced oil recovery in Jinnan oil field[J]. Petrochemical Technology, 2018, 25(4):269-270.
[15]	施雷庭, 张玉龙, 户海胜, 等. 砂砾岩致密油藏超临界二氧化碳吞吐适应性分析[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2020, 20(9):3598-3604.
	SHI Leiting, ZHANG Yulong, HU Haisheng, et al. Adaptability Analysis of Supercritical CO₂ Huff and Puff in Tight Glutenite Reservoir[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2020, 20(9):3598-3604.
[16]	王涛, 姚约东, 李相方, 等. 二氧化碳驱油效果影响因素与分析[J]. 中国石油和化工, 2008, 15(24):30-33.
	WANG Tao, YAO Yuedong, LI Xiangfang, et al. Influencing factors and analysis of carbon dioxide flooding effect[J]. Petroleum Engineering Technology, 2008, 15(24):30-33.
[17]	梁宏儒, 薛海涛, 卢双舫, 等. 致密油藏水平井水力压裂CO₂吞吐参数优化[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2016, 35(4):161-167.
	LIANG Hongru, XUE Haitao, LU Shuangfang, et al. Parameters optimization of hydro-fractured CO₂ huff-puff horizontal well in the tight oil reservoir[J]. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2016, 35(4):161-167.
[18]	LINDEBERG E, GRIMSTAD A, BERGMO P, et al. Large scale tertiary CO₂ EOR in mature water flooded norwegian oil fields[J]. Energy Procedia, 2017, 114:7096-7106. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1851
[19]	SUN R X, YU W, XU F, et al. Compositional simulation of CO₂ huff-n-puff process in Middle Bakken tight oil reservoirs with hydraulic fractures[J]. Fuel, 2019, 236:1446-1457. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.09.113
[20]	周拓, 刘学伟, 王艳丽, 等. 致密油藏水平井分段压裂CO₂吞吐实验研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报:自然科学版, 2017, 39(2):125-131.
	ZHOU Tuo, LIU Xuewei, WANG Yanli, et al. Experiments of CO₂ huff-n-puff process in staged fracturing horizontal wells for developing tight oil reservoirs[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2017, 39(2):125-131.
[21]	SONG C Y, YANG D Y. Experimental and numerical evaluation of CO₂ huff-n-puff processes in Bakken formation[J]. Fuel, 2017, 190:145-162. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.11.041
[22]	王高峰, 孙蓉, 鞠玮艳, 等. 低渗透油藏气驱注采压力系统诊断模型[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2019, 18(20):96-101.
	WANG Gaofeng, SUN Rong, JU Weiyan, et al. Diagnosis of injection-production pressure system in gas flooding tight reservoirs[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2019, 18(20):96-101.
[23]	REN B, DUNCAN I J. Reservoir simulation of carbon storage associated with CO₂ EOR in residual oil zones, San Andres formation of West Texas, Permian Basin, USA[J]. Energy, 2019, 167:391-401. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.11.007

岩心编号	长度（cm）	直径（cm）	渗透率（10^-3μm²）	孔隙度（%）	M （g）
LY-19-1	7.842	2.531	0.076	6.18	87.609
LY-19-2	7.937	2.536	0.054	5.87	88.128
LY-19-3	7.867	2.523	0.063	6.12	87.411
LY-19-4	7.905	2.518	0.058	5.96	87.799
LY-19-5	7.896	2.520	0.060	5.98	87.687
LY-19-6	7.872	2.508	0.061	6.02	86.846

岩心编号	M₁（g）	M₂（g）	压力（MPa）	萃取率（%）
LY-19-1	88.872	88.841	7	2.45
LY-19-2	89.329	89.187	8	11.82
LY-19-3	88.667	88.446	10	17.60
LY-19-4	89.004	88.734	15	22.41
LY-19-5	88.933	88.644	20	23.19
LY-19-6	88.021	87.746	25	23.40

岩心编号	长度（cm）	直径（cm）	渗透率（10^-3μm²）	孔隙度（%）	M（g）
LY-19-7	7.904	2.514	0.072	6.12	87.632
LY-19-8	7.927	2.509	0.064	5.96	88.017
LY-19-9	7.858	2.516	0.057	5.71	88.236
LY-19-10	7.898	2.521	0.061	5.76	87.374
LY-19-11	7.919	2.519	0.058	5.66	86.925
LY-19-12	7.814	2.525	0.072	6.14	87.251
LY-19-13	7.848	2.505	0.068	5.98	88.226

岩心编号	M₁（g）	M₂（g）	温度（℃）	萃取率（%）
LY-19-7	88.887	88.880	30	0.56
LY-19-8	89.233	88.957	35	22.70
LY-19-9	89.389	89.119	40	23.44
LY-19-10	88.557	88.277	45	23.68
LY-19-11	88.119	87.910	50	17.50
LY-19-12	88.588	88.367	55	16.53
LY-19-13	89.486	89.283	60	16.11

岩心编号	长度（cm）	直径（cm）	渗透率（10^-3μm²）	孔隙度（%）	M（g）
LY-19-14	7.897	2.524	0.056	5.67	88.713
LY-19-15	7.905	2.509	0.071	6.06	89.039
LY-19-16	7.866	2.517	0.068	5.94	88.618
LY-19-17	7.881	2.491	0.055	5.66	87.695
LY-19-18	7.914	2.505	0.051	5.48	86.599
LY-19-19	7.835	2.510	0.062	5.78	86.893

Experimental researches on factors influencing supercritical CO₂ extraction effect of crude oil from tight sandy conglomerate

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 22

References 23

Related Articles 12

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

岩心编号	M₁（g）	M₂（g）	浸泡时间（min）	萃取率（%）
LY-19-14	89.903	89.783	30	10.08
LY-19-15	90.260	89.982	60	22.77
LY-19-16	89.833	89.551	90	23.21
LY-19-17	88.870	88.580	120	24.68
LY-19-18	87.687	87.417	150	24.82
LY-19-19	88.040	87.752	180	25.11

岩心编号	长度（cm）	直径（cm）	渗透率（10^-3μm²）	孔隙度（%）	M（g）
LY-19-20	7.871	2.534	0.055	5.62	87.512
LY-19-21	7.898	2.518	0.064	5.89	89.230
LY-19-22	7.903	2.526	0.077	6.22	88.701
LY-19-23	7.865	2.509	0.082	6.86	87.563
LY-19-24	7.927	2.513	0.066	5.94	86.436
LY-19-25	7.858	2.494	0.072	6.14	87.362

岩心编号	M₁（g）	M₂（g）	循环时间（min）	萃取率（%）
LY-19-20	88.741	88.527	30	17.41
LY-19-21	90.489	90.198	60	23.11
LY-19-22	89.994	89.682	90	24.13
LY-19-23	88.980	88.629	120	24.77
LY-19-24	87.634	87.333	150	25.13
LY-19-25	88.611	88.296	180	25.22

岩心编号	长度（cm）	直径（cm）	渗透率（10^-3μm²）	孔隙度（%）
LY-19-26	7.900	2.544	0.058	5.96
LY-19-27	7.932	2.504	0.072	6.82
LY-19-28	7.890	2.488	0.083	7.11
LY-19-29	7.892	2.510	0.064	6.86
LY-19-30	7.848	2.496	0.068	6.42
LY-19-31	7.828	2.516	0.076	6.94
LY-19-32	7.786	2.532	0.064	6.12
LY-19-33	7.813	2.512	0.057	5.88
LY-19-34	7.806	2.530	0.066	6.33

岩心编号	M（g）	M₁（g）	M₂（g）	萃取率（%）
LY-19-26	88.214	89.520	89.270	19.14
LY-19-27	89.023	90.483	90.173	21.23
LY-19-28	88.861	90.303	89.981	22.33
LY-19-29	87.960	89.389	89.059	23.09
LY-19-30	86.859	88.140	87.819	25.06
LY-19-31	87.128	88.539	88.208	23.46
LY-19-32	88.362	89.643	89.319	25.29
LY-19-33	88.882	90.113	89.804	25.10
LY-19-34	87.772	89.092	88.765	24.77

方案	因素				萃取率（%）
方案	压力（MPa）	温度（℃）	浸泡时间（min）	循环时间（min）	萃取率（%）
1	15	40	60	90	19.14
2	15	50	90	120	21.23
3	15	60	120	150	22.33
4	20	40	90	150	23.09
5	20	50	120	90	25.06
6	20	60	60	120	23.46
7	25	40	120	120	25.29
8	25	50	60	150	25.10
9	25	60	90	90	24.77

实验指标		因素
实验指标		压力（MPa）	温度（℃）	浸泡时间（min）	循环时间（min）
指标和	T₁	62.680	67.540	67.660	68.970
	T₂	71.601	71.349	69.141	69.951
	T₃	75.150	70.539	72.630	70.509
指标均值	t₁	20.893	22.513	22.553	22.990
	t₂	23.867	23.783	23.047	23.317
	t₃	25.050	23.513	24.210	23.503
极差	R	4.157	1.270	1.657	0.513

因素	偏差平方和	自由度	F比值	F临界值
压力	27.519	2	1.000	9.000
温度	2.686	2	0.098	9.000
浸泡时间	4.341	2	0.158	9.000
循环时间	0.405	2	0.015	9.000
误差	27.52	2

[1]	JIN Guang, TENG Hongquan, GUO Hong, XIA Qing, SHEN Zhenkun, LIU Qiang, LI Shuangtao, NIU Jianbo, CAI Wanlong. Analysis of heat exchange performance and optimization of inner pipe design in geothermal wells reconstructed from depleted oil and gas wells [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(6): 864-871.
[2]	SHI Yan, XIE Junhui, GUO Xiaoting, WU Tong, CHEN Dequan, SUN Lin, DU Daijun. Experimental study on CO₂ flooding/huff and puff of medium-deep heavy oil in Xinjiang Oilfield [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 76-82.
[3]	ZHANG Zhichao,BAI Mingxing,DU Siyu. Characteristics of pore dynamics in shale reservoirs by CO₂ flooding [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 42-47.
[4]	SHU Huawen. Key engineering technologies of one-million-ton CCUS transportation-injection-extraction in Shengli Oilfield [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 10-17.
[5]	LI Ying, MA Hansong, LI Haitao, GANZER Leonhard, TANG Zheng, LI Ke, LUO Hongwei. Dissolution of supercritical CO₂ on carbonate reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 288-295.
[6]	WANG Yingwei,WU Shunwei,QIN Jianhua,YE Yiping,GAO Yang,ZHANG Jing. Effects of supercritical CO₂ immersion on permeability of sandy conglomerate reservoir with different clay mineral content in Mahu [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(6): 837-844.
[7]	CHEN Shijie,PAN Yi,SUN Lei,SI Yong,LIANG Fei,GAO Li. Mechanism of enhanced oil recovery by CO₂ combination flooding in low permeability and high pour-point reservoir [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(6): 823-830.
[8]	LIU Penggang,SUN Tianli,CHEN Wei,HOU Xiaozhi,HUANG Yuanhe,ZHU Guo,HE Hai,FANG Bin. Analysis and optimization of influencing factors of negative pressure stripping desulfurization process for sour water in Yuanba gas field [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(4): 125-129.
[9]	LI Shilun,SUN Lei,CHEN Zuhua,LI Jian,TANG Yong,PAN Yi. Further discussion on reservoir engineering concept and development mode of CO₂ flooding-EOR technology [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(3): 1-14.
[10]	YANG Ming,LI Xiaobo,TAN Tao,LI Qing,LIU Honggunag,ZANG Yixia. Remaining oil distribution and potential tapping measures for palaeo-subterranean river reservoirs: A case study of TK440 well area in Tahe Oilfield [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(2): 43-48.
[11]	QI Guixue. Effect of CO₂ extraction on minimum miscibility pressure [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(6): 51-55.
[12]	Shi Leiting,Zhu Shijie,Ma Jie,Yang Mei,Peng Yangping,Ye Zhongbin. Numerical simulation of tight oil extraction with supercritical CO₂ [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(3): 25-31.

Experimental researches on factors influencing supercritical CO2 extraction effect of crude oil from tight sandy conglomerate

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 22

References 23

Related Articles 12

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

Experimental researches on factors influencing supercritical CO₂ extraction effect of crude oil from tight sandy conglomerate