超临界CO2浸泡对玛湖不同黏土矿物含量砂砾岩储层渗透率影响

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2021.06.006

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to clarify the influence of supercritical CO₂ immersion on the physical properties of glutenite reservoirs with different clay mineral content in Mahu under the conditions of Xinjiang Mahu glutenite reservoir. Several researches have been done. Firstly, the type and proportion of clay minerals in the reservoir were determined according to the results of X-ray diffraction （XRD）：kaolinite （1.52 %）, montmorillonite （0.42 %）, chlorite （0.73 %）, illite （0.68 %）. Secondly, the core which is close to the pore permeability of reservoir core is made manually. Finally, under the condition of reservoir temperature at 70 ℃ and pressure of 20 MPa, using supercritical CO₂ high-temperature and high-pressure reaction device, and the experimental study on the influence of supercritical CO₂ immersion on the permeability of sandy conglomerate reservoir with different clay mineral content was carried out. The results show that when the clay mineral content is 2.5 % ~ 6.0 %, the permeability of the reservoir increases after the injection CO₂, the lower the clay mineral content, the shorter the action time and the more obvious the permeability increase. When the clay mineral content in the reservoir is greater than 7.5 %, with the increase of the action time, the permeability gradually decreases, and the higher the clay mineral content is, the greater the decrease is. When the clay mineral content is 6.0 % ~ 7.0 %, CO₂ has the best effect on improving reservoir permeability.

Key words: supercritical CO₂, immersion, clay mineral content, interaction, permeability, sandy conglomerate reservoir

CLC Number:

TE357

Yingwei WANG,Shunwei WU,Jianhua QIN, et al. Effects of supercritical CO₂ immersion on permeability of sandy conglomerate reservoir with different clay mineral content in Mahu[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(6): 837-844.

Figures/Tables 22

Fig. 1

Table 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Table 2

Table 3

Fig. 4

Table 4

Table 5

Fig. 5

Table 6

Table 7

Fig. 6

Table 8

Table 9

Fig. 7

Table 10

Table 11

Fig. 8

Table 12

Table 13

Fig. 9

References 22

[1]	邹才能, 翟光明, 张光亚, 等. 全球常规-非常规油气形成分布、资源潜力及趋势预测[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(1):13-25.
	ZOU Caineng, ZHAI Guangming, ZHANG Guangya, et al. Formation, distribution, potential and prediction of global conventional and unconventional hydrocarbons resources[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(1):13-25.
[2]	李国欣, 朱如凯. 中国石油非常规油气发展现状、挑战与关注问题[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(2):1-13.
	LI Guoxin, ZHU Rukai. Progress, challenges and key issues of unconventional oil and gas development of CNPC[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(2):1-13.
[3]	吴西顺, 孙张涛, 杨添天, 等. 全球非常规油气勘探开发进展及资源潜力[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2020, 36(4):1-17.
	WU Xishun, SUN Zhangtao, YANG Tiantian, et al. Global progress in exploration and development of unconventional hydrocarbons and assessment of resources potential[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2020, 36(4):1-17.
[4]	何云超, 张崇瑞. 新疆准噶尔盆地发现世界储量最大的砾岩油田[J]. 中国地质, 2017, 44(6):1174-1174.
	HE Yunchao, ZHANG Chongrui. The world’s largest conglomerate oil field discovered in Junggar basin, Xinjiang[J]. Geology In China, 2017, 44(6):1174-1174.
[5]	李映艳, 钱根葆, 高阳, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷百口泉组砾岩致密油藏地质“甜点”分级标准及应用[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2018, 42(6):85-94.
	LI Yingyan, QIAN Genbao, GAO Yang, et al. Identification criterion of the geological “sweet point” of conglomerate tight reservoir and its application of Baikouquan formation in Mahu sag, Junggar basin[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2018, 42(6):85-94.
[6]	ZHANG X, WEI B, SHANG J, et al. Alterations of geochemical properties of a tight sandstone reservoir caused by supercritical CO₂-brine-rock interactions in CO₂-EOR and geosequestration[J]. Journal of CO₂ Utilization, 2018, 28:408-418.
[7]	施雷庭, 朱诗杰, 马杰, 等. 超临界CO₂萃取致密油的数值模拟研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2019, 9(3):25-31.
	SHI Leiting, ZHU Shijie, MA Jie, et al. Numerical simulation of tight oil extraction with supercritical CO₂[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(3):25-31.
[8]	DU D J, PU W F, JIN F Y, et al. Experimental study on EOR by CO₂ huff-n-puff and CO₂ flooding in tight conglomerate reservoirs with pore scale[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2020, 156:425-432. doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2020.02.018
[9]	刘玲, 汤达祯, 王烽. 鄂尔多斯盆地临兴区块太原组致密砂岩黏土矿物特征及其对储层物性的影响[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(6):28-35.
	LIU Ling, TANG Dazhen, WANG Feng. Clay minerals characteristics of tight sandstone and its impact on reservoir physical properties Taiyuan formation of block Linxing in Ordos basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(6):28-35.
[10]	SONG Z J, SONG Y L, LI Y Z, et al. A critical review of CO₂ enhanced oil recovery in tight oil reservoirs of North America and China[J]. Fuel, 2020, 276:118006. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118006
[11]	LI S H, ZHANG S C, ZOU Y S, et al. Pore structure alteration induced by CO₂-brine-rock interaction during CO₂ energetic fracturing in tight oil reservoirs[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 191:107147. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107147
[12]	WU S T, ZOU C N, MA D S, et al. Reservoir property changes during CO₂-brine flow-through experiments in tight sandstone: Implications for CO₂ enhanced oil recovery in the Triassic Chang 7 Member tight sandstone, Ordos Basin, China[J]. Journal of Asian earth sciences, 2019, 179:200-210. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2019.05.002
[13]	戴彩丽, 丁行行, 于志豪, 等. CO₂和地层水对储层物性的影响研究进展[J]. 油田化学, 2019, 36(4):741-747.
	DAI Caili, DING Xingxing, YU Zhihao, et al. Research progress on the effects of CO₂ and formation water on reservoir physical properties[J]. Oilfield Chemistry, 2019, 36(4):741-747.
[14]	REN B, DUNCAN I J. Reservoir simulation of carbon storage associated with CO₂ EOR in residual oil zones, San Andres formation of West Texas, Permian Basin, USA[J]. Energy, 2019, 167:391-401. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.11.007
[15]	袁舟, 廖新维, 赵晓亮, 等. 砂岩油藏CO₂驱替过程中溶蚀作用对储层物性的影响[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2020, 27(5):97-104.
	YUAN Zhou, LIAO Xinwei, ZHAO Xiaoliang, et al. Effect of dissolution on physical properties of sandstone reservoirs during CO₂ flooding[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2020, 27(5):97-104.
[16]	周拓, 刘学伟, 王艳丽, 等. 致密油藏水平井分段压裂CO₂吞吐实验研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(2):125-131.
	ZHOU Tuo, LIU Xuewei, WANG Yanli, et al. Experiments of CO₂ huff-n-puff process in staged fracturing horizontal wells for developing tight oil reservoirs[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2017, 39(2):125-131.
[17]	WU S Y, LI Z M, SARMA H K. Influence of confinement effect on recovery mechanisms of CO₂-enhanced tight-oil recovery process considering critical properties shift, capillarity and adsorption[J]. Fuel, 2019, 262:116569. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116569
[18]	何应付, 赵淑霞, 刘学伟. 致密油藏多级压裂水平井CO₂吞吐机理[J]. 断块油气田, 2018, 25(6):752-756.
	HE Yingfu, ZHAO Shuxia, LIU Xuewei, et al. Mechanism of CO₂ Huff and Puff of multi-stage fractured horizontal well in tight oil reservoir[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2018, 25(6):752-756.
[19]	李阳, 李树同, 牟炜卫, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长6段致密砂岩中黏土矿物对储层物性的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(7):1043-1053.
	LI Yang, LI Shutong, MOU Weiwei, et al. Influences of clay minerals on physical properties of Chang 6 tight sandstone reservoir in Jiyuan Area, Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28(7):1043-1053.
[20]	刘玲, 汤达祯, 王烽. 鄂尔多斯盆地临兴区块太原组致密砂岩黏土矿物特征及其对储层物性的影响[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(6):28-35.
	LIU Ling, TANG Dazhen, WANG Feng. Clay minerals characteristics of tight sandstone and its impact on reservoir physical properties in Taiyuan Formation of block Linxing in Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(6):28-35.
[21]	SUN R X, YU W, XU F, et al. Compositional simulation of CO₂ Huff-n-Puff process in Middle Bakken tight oil reservoirs with hydraulic fractures[J]. Fuel, 2019, 236:1446-1457. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.09.113
[22]	施雷庭, 户海胜, 张玉龙, 等. 致密砂砾岩矿物与超临界CO₂和地层水相互作用[J]. 油田化学, 2019, 36(4):640-645.
	SHI Leiting, HU Haisheng, ZHANG Yulong, et al. Interaction of tight glutenite mineral with supercritical CO₂ and formation water[J]. Oilfield Chemistry, 2019, 36(4):640-645.

矿物组成	占比（%）	矿物组成	占比（%）
高岭石	1.52	绿泥石	0.73
蒙脱石	0.42	伊利石	0.68

岩心编号	浸泡时间（d）	气测渗透率（10^-3μm²）		孔隙度（%）
岩心编号	浸泡时间（d）	浸泡前	浸泡后	浸泡前	浸泡后
LY-5-1	1	9.68	9.74	11.59	11.67
LY-5-2	1	9.79	9.93	12.00	12.08
LY-5-3	3	9.24	9.48	11.85	12.06
LY-5-4	3	9.32	9.55	11.61	11.72
LY-5-5	6	9.70	9.82	11.42	11.57
LY-5-6	6	9.62	9.75	11.67	11.82
LY-5-7	10	9.54	9.71	11.74	11.84
LY-5-8	10	9.81	9.97	11.65	11.86

岩心编号	长度（cm）	直径（cm）	气测渗透率（10^-3μm²）	孔隙度（%）
LY-1-1	7.34	2.52	7.32	11.34
LY-1-2	7.35	2.52	8.14	11.56
LY-1-3	7.30	2.52	7.97	11.38
LY-1-4	7.24	2.53	7.66	11.27
LY-1-5	7.45	2.53	8.05	11.36
LY-1-6	6.93	2.53	7.86	11.47
LY-1-7	7.21	2.52	7.74	11.30
LY-1-8	7.24	2.53	7.62	11.54

岩心编号	浸泡时间（d）	反应后水相渗透率（10^-3μm²）	平均渗透率（10^-3μm²）
LY-1-1	1	0.64	0.62
LY-1-2	1	0.60	0.62
LY-1-3	3	0.40	0.40
LY-1-4	3	0.40	0.40
LY-1-5	6	0.33	0.35
LY-1-6	6	0.38	0.35
LY-1-7	10	0.36	0.34
LY-1-8	10	0.32	0.34

岩心编号	长度（cm）	直径（cm）	气测渗透率（10^-3μm²）	孔隙度（%）
LY-2-1	7.23	2.53	7.01	11.03
LY-2-2	7.29	2.53	7.12	11.12
LY-2-3	7.34	2.53	7.62	11.31
LY-2-4	7.08	2.53	7.34	11.25
LY-2-5	7.30	2.53	7.57	11.45
LY-2-6	7.22	2.53	7.22	11.31
LY-2-7	7.31	2.53	7.96	11.47
LY-2-8	7.30	2.53	7.33	11.29

Effects of supercritical CO₂ immersion on permeability of sandy conglomerate reservoir with different clay mineral content in Mahu

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 22

References 22

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

岩心编号	浸泡时间（d）	反应后水相渗透率（10^-3μm²）	平均渗透率（10^-3μm²）
LY-2-1	1	0.44	0.44
LY-2-2	1	0.43	0.44
LY-2-3	3	0.42	0.41
LY-2-4	3	0.39	0.41
LY-2-5	6	0.38	0.38
LY-2-6	6	0.39	0.38
LY-2-7	10	0.36	0.37
LY-2-8	10	0.38	0.37

岩心编号	长度（cm）	直径（cm）	气测渗透率（10^-3μm²）	孔隙度（%）
LY-3-1	7.12	2.52	8.23	11.65
LY-3-2	7.24	2.51	8.04	11.48
LY-3-3	7.30	2.53	8.33	11.54
LY-3-4	7.08	2.53	8.51	11.68
LY-3-5	7.30	2.53	8.11	11.32
LY-3-6	7.22	2.53	8.17	11.41
LY-3-7	7.31	2.53	8.26	11.50
LY-3-8	7.30	2.53	8.44	11.61

岩心编号	浸泡时间（d）	反应后水相渗透率（10^-3μm²）	平均渗透率（10^-3μm²）
LY-3-1	1	0.52	0.53
LY-3-2	1	0.54	0.53
LY-3-3	3	0.57	0.61
LY-3-4	3	0.65	0.61
LY-3-5	6	0.68	0.63
LY-3-6	6	0.58	0.63
LY-3-7	10	0.60	0.62
LY-3-8	10	0.64	0.62

岩心编号	长度（cm）	直径（cm）	气测渗透率（10^-3μm²）	孔隙度（%）
LY-4-1	7.20	2.53	8.87	11.74
LY-4-2	7.36	2.52	8.74	11.68
LY-4-3	7.21	2.53	9.01	11.88
LY-4-4	7.28	2.52	8.64	11.54
LY-4-5	7.09	2.52	8.67	11.72
LY-4-6	7.15	2.53	8.66	11.64
LY-4-7	7.22	2.53	8.58	11.59
LY-4-8	7.26	2.53	8.69	11.71

岩心编号	浸泡时间（d）	反应后水相渗透率（10^-3μm²）	平均渗透率（10^-3μm²）
LY-4-1	1	0.30	0.34
LY-4-2	1	0.38	0.34
LY-4-3	3	0.54	0.48
LY-4-4	3	0.41	0.48
LY-4-5	6	0.43	0.39
LY-4-6	6	0.35	0.39
LY-4-7	10	0.39	0.35
LY-4-8	10	0.31	0.35

岩心编号	浸泡时间（d）	反应后水相渗透率（10^-3μm²）	平均渗透率（10^-3μm²）
LY-5-1	1	0.49	0.45
LY-5-2	1	0.41	0.45
LY-5-3	3	0.45	0.41
LY-5-4	3	0.37	0.41
LY-5-5	6	0.35	0.33
LY-5-6	6	0.31	0.33
LY-5-7	10	0.34	0.30
LY-5-8	10	0.26	0.30

[1]	MIN Chao,LI Yingjun,LI Xiaogang,HUA Qing,ZHANG Na. Application of intuitive fuzzy MABAC method in optimizing favorable areas of low permeability carbonate gas reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(4): 577-585.
[2]	LI Zhongchao, QI Guixue, LUO Bobo, XU Xun, CHEN Hua. Gas flooding adaptability of deep low permeability condensate gas reservoir [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(3): 324-332.
[3]	TANG Yong, TANG Kai, XIA Guang, XU Di. Retrograde condensation pollution and removal method of BZ19-6 low permeability reservoir [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 102-107.
[4]	GUO Zhidong, KANG Yili, WANG Yubin, GU Linjiao, YOU Lijun, CHEN Mingjun, YAN Maoling. Gas-water relative permeability characteristics and production dynamic response of low pressure and high water cut tight gas reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 138-150.
[5]	LI Jianshan, GAO Hao, YAN Changhao, WANG Shitou, WANG Liangliang. Molecular dynamics simulation on interaction mechanisms of crude oil and CO₂ [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 26-34.
[6]	ZHANG Zhichao,BAI Mingxing,DU Siyu. Characteristics of pore dynamics in shale reservoirs by CO₂ flooding [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 42-47.
[7]	SUN Yili. Mechanism of CO₂ injection to improve the water injection capacity of low permeability reservoir in Shuanghe Oilfield in Henan [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 55-63.
[8]	LIANG Yunpei, ZHANG Huaijun, WANG Lichun, QIN Chaozhong, TIAN Jian, CHEN Qiang, SHI Bowen. Numerical simulation of flow fields and permeability evolution in real fractures under continuous loading stress [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(6): 834-843.
[9]	CHEN Minfeng,QIN Lifeng,ZHAO Kang,WANG Yiwen. Effective injection-production well spacing in pressure-sensitive reservoir with low permeability [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(6): 855-862.
[10]	ZHANG Fengxi, NIU Congcong, ZHANG Yichi. Evaluation of multi-stage fracturing a horizontal well of low permeability reservoirs in East China Sea [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 695-702.
[11]	HU Zhijian, LI Shuxin, WANG Jianjun, ZHOU Hong, ZHAO Yulong, ZHANG Liehui. Productivity evaluation of multi-stage fracturing horizontal wells in shale gas reservoir with complex artificial fracture occurrence [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 459-466.
[12]	LI Ying, MA Hansong, LI Haitao, GANZER Leonhard, TANG Zheng, LI Ke, LUO Hongwei. Dissolution of supercritical CO₂ on carbonate reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 288-295.
[13]	WANG Dianlin, YANG Qiong, WEI Bing, JI Bingxin, XIN Jun, SUN Lin. Effect of betaine surfactant structure on the properties of CO₂ foam film [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 313-321.
[14]	LIAO Songlin,XIA Yang,CUI Yinan,LIU Fangzhi,CAO Shengjiang,TANG Yong. Variation of crude oil properties with multi-cycle CO₂ huff-n-puff of horizontal wells in ultra-low permeability reservoir [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 784-793.
[15]	GUO Deming,PAN Yi,SUN Yang,CHAO Zhongtang,LI Xiaonan,CHENG Shisheng. EOR mechanism of viscosity reducer-CO₂ combined flooding in heavy oil reservoir with low permeability [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 794-802.

Effects of supercritical CO2 immersion on permeability of sandy conglomerate reservoir with different clay mineral content in Mahu

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 22

References 22

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

Effects of supercritical CO₂ immersion on permeability of sandy conglomerate reservoir with different clay mineral content in Mahu