平桥南区块页岩气井井下节流技术研究与现场应用

Abstract

Abstract:

Although the traditional surface process of shale gas field can effectively solve the problem of hydrate blockage, there are still many other problems such as safety production and green economy development existing in gas fields. The downhole throttlingtechnology can simplify the ground flow, lower the cost of investment, reduce the risk of gas test on the ground, and ensure on-site safety. However, due to the influence of geological conditions and the production rule of gas and liquid, it has not been applied in shale gas fields at home and abroad. By analyzing the applicable conditions of downhole throttling technology in high-pressure shale gas wells in south block of Pingqiao area, and comparing changes of gas volume and pressure before and after the application of this technology for single well, and the downhole depth, aperture and downflow time of downhole throttling were clarified. The results proved that this technology could not only effectively avoid the formation of hydrates in the high-pressure shale gas wells in south block of Pingqiao area, but also significantly reduce the pressure of the wellhead and the ground pipeline, simplify the ground flow, and have significant economic value and good application prospects.

Key words: south block of Pingqiao area, downhole throttling technology, high-pressure shale gas wells, simplification of processes, gas mouth, low pressure gas gathering

CLC Number:

TE37

YUAN Hang,GU Hongtao,LI Jiaxin. Research and field application of downhole throttling technology for shale gas wells in south block of Pingqiao area[J].Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(4): 83-88.

Figures/Tables 6

Table 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Table 2

Table 3

References 15

[1]	吴革生, 王效明, 韩东 , 等. 井下节流技术在长庆气田试验研究及应用[J]. 天然气工业, 2005,25(4):65-67.
[2]	金忠臣, 杨川东, 张守良 , 等. 采气工程[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2004: 294-335.
[3]	张琪 . 采油工程原理与设计[M]. 东营: 中国石油大学出版社, 2000: 63-68.
[4]	陈强, 王怒涛, 阮开贵 , 等. 页岩气井产量递减分析方法选择研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2018,8(2):76-79.
[5]	魏晋秦 . 气井井下节流排水采气工艺难点及优化[J]. 化工设计通讯, 2019,45(2):239.
[6]	陈真, 张红亮, 王文君 . 气井井下节流排水采气工艺技术探讨[J]. 辽宁化工, 2019,48(2):166-168.
[7]	董长新 . 井下节流工艺在涪陵页岩气井中的应用效果研究[J]. 中国石油和化工标准与质量, 2019,39(2):248-250.
[8]	陈冠举 . 中国页岩气地面集输工艺技术研究[J]. 现代化工, 2018,39(8):185-188.
[9]	任基文, 黎昌波, 李波 . 浅析天然气井下节流技术应用研究[J]. 石化技术, 2018,25(6):195.
[10]	夏海帮, 袁航, 岑涛 . 彭水区块页岩气生产井排采方式研究与应用[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2014,42(4):21-26.
[11]	谷红陶, 袁航, 夏海帮 . 彭水页岩气水平井中靶技术与应用[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2015,5(6):76-80.
[12]	田戈江 . 页岩储层流体赋存状态及其地质主控因素分析—以涪陵龙马溪组页岩气为例[J]. 江汉石油职工大学学报, 2019,32(1):1-4.
[13]	郭旭升 . 四川盆地涪陵平桥页岩气田五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019,30(1):1-10.
[14]	刘方圆 . 涪陵页岩气田焦页XHF井生产动态分析及建议[J]. 地质科技情报, 2018,37(3):196-201.
[15]	姜昊坤 . 涪陵页岩气产能变化规律及合理配产研究[J]. 江汉石油职工大学学报, 2018,31(1):21-22.

井深/m	压力/MPa	温度/ ℃	理论携液率,%	实际携液率,%	产气量/ m³	产液量/10⁴m³
0	25.61	35.00	0.030	0.007 2	92 090	10.42
294.93	26.19	40.72	0.045	0.007 3
579.82	26.82	46.58	0.062	0.007 8
881.83	27.49	53.43	0.087	0.008 2
1 183.96	28.15	60.68	0.099	0.008 7
1 466.85	28.82	67.69	0.104	0.009 1
1 764.18	29.43	74.94	0.115	0.009 8
2 010.31	30.09	79.83	0.123	0.011 2
2 050.70	30.22	80.68	0.127	0.013 0
2 104.80	30.38	81.74	0.129	0.014 7

井号	节流前油压/ MPa		节流后油压/ MPa		节流前后油压差/MPa
井号	最大	平均	最大	平均	最大	平均
JY194-1	29	25	4.6	4.4	24.2	20.6
JY194-2	30	25	4.7	4.35	25.3	20.65
JY194-3	31	25.2	4.6	4.26	26.4	20.94
JY195-1	28.5	24	4.8	4.28	23.7	19.72
JY195-2	29	24.6	4.4	4.17	24.6	20.43
平均	29.5	24.76	4.62	4.292	25.21	20.47

井号	试验前		试验后
井号	平均油压/ MPa	水合物形成温度/℃	平均油压/ MPa	水合物形成温度/℃
JY194-1	27	21.62	4.3	8.63
JY194-2	28	22.01	4.26	8.55
JY194-3	26	20.97	4.32	8.74
JY195-1	27	21.62	4.18	8.32
JY195-2	26	20.97	4.22	8.47
平均	26.8	21.44	4.26	8.54

Research and field application of downhole throttling technology for shale gas wells in south block of Pingqiao area

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 6

References 15

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	LIANG Xing,ZHANG Chao,ZHANG Pengwei,ZHANG Lei,WANG Gaocheng,PAN Yuanwei,ZHAO Chunduan,ZHANG Jiehui,WANG Weixu,QIU Kaibin. Research and application of geomechanics of shale gas in deep mountain of Yichang, Hubei [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(5): 20-31.
[2]	XIAO Dianshi,LU Shuangfang,FANG Dazhi,KONG Xingxing,CHEN Fangwen,LI Jijun. Pore connectivity of marine high-maturity shale gas reservoirs: A case study in Longmaxi formation, Pengshui area [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(5): 45-53.
[3]	LIU Hua,WANG Weihong,WANG Yanyan,GU Hongtao,JIN Bingyao. Productivity characterization method of shale gas wells [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(5): 63-69.
[4]	XIA Haibang. Research and application of soluble bridge plug in Nanchuan shale gas field [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(4): 79-82.
[5]	WANG Jinghui,Mei Minghua,LIANG Zhengzhong,WANG Huajun. Quantitative evaluation of high production areas of CBM with high coal rank in southern Qinshui Basin [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(4): 68-72.
[6]	Lei Xiao,Li Shusong,Wang Wenjuan,Zhang Fengbo,He Zhihui,Ma Shuai. Application of a well testing simulation technique in productivity evaluation of well-X1 in high temperature and high pressure reservoir [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(2): 17-20.
[7]	Feng Fuping,Lei Yang,Chen Dingfeng,Hu Chaoyang,Wang Huzhen,Huang Rui. Parameter analysis of SRV fracturing effect of tight reservoirs based on finite element numerical simulation [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(1): 29-33.
[8]	Zhao Jinzhou,You Xianyong,Li Yongming,Pu Xuan. Analysis of unsteady early period production forecast model for fractured horizontal wells in shale gas reservoir [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2018, 8(6): 70-76.
[9]	Wang Haitao,Kou Zuhao,Zhang Liehui,Guo Jingjing. Research on well test interpretation model for composite gas reservoir with high sulfur [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2018, 8(6): 24-27.
[10]	Liu Pingli,Li Zhenming,Song Yuchun,Zhao Liqiang,Guo Yujie,Li Jun. Experimental study on influence factors of proppant placement in main fracture of channel fracturing process [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2018, 8(5): 42-47.
[11]	Liu Xin,Zhang Lina,Zhang Yaozu. Influence of fracturing parameters on development effects of shale gas wells in southeast Sichuan basin: A case of well LP-133HF [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2018, 8(5): 77-80.
[12]	Tan Yongsheng,Li Haitao,Jiang Beibei,Wang Yongqing,Zhang Nan. A non-steady state model of gas reservoir and horizontal wellbore coupling based on volume source [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2018, 8(3): 24-29.
[13]	Xiong Yu,Ye Haifeng,Cai Mingjin,Niu Xinnian. Pressure response analysis of large scale series double fracture-cavity carbonate reservoir [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2018, 8(2): 22-29.
[14]	Wang Shaofei,Wang Zhouhua,Zhang Yaling,Guo Ping,Jiao Tingkui,Du Jianfen. A new cognition of the reduction of retrograde condensation damage in gas condensate wells by fracturing [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2018, 8(2): 30-34.
[15]	Liu Qiguo,Cen Xuefang,Li Longxin,Lu Heng,Jin Jiyan. Study on applicability of trilinear flow model for multistage fractured horizontal well [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2018, 8(2): 63-67.