一种建立毛管束模型的新方法

Abstract

Abstract:

The capillary bundle model is one of the most common physical models for the porous media. The most classic physical model is the straight capillary bundle model with same diameter. But the bendability of the porous media is neglected in this physical model. Therefore, based on the tight sandstone, combined with the mercury data, and by the introduction of the correction factor-tortuosity, we put forward a new approach to establish the capillary bundle model. This approach considers the bendability of the capillary bundle model and can accurately calculate the radius of capillary, capillary porosity and permeability, capillary volume of different radius and permeability contribution of capillary bundle model with different radius. This new approach has great significance for the study of the reservoir fluid imbibition of specific pressure and quantitatively characterizing the water invasion reservoir damage.

Key words: physical model, capillary bundle model, capillary pressure, tortuosity, porosity, permeability

CLC Number:

TE122.2

Yuan Yuan,Meng Yingfeng,Tang Hanlin. A new approach to establishing the capillary bundle model[J].Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2018, 8(3): 35-39.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Table 1

Fig. 3

Table 2

Fig. 4

Table 3

Fig. 5

References 7

[1]	Purcell W R . Capillary pressures-their measurement using mercury and the calculation of permeability therefrom[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1949,1(2):39-48. doi: 10.2118/949039-G
[2]	Dullien F A L . Effects of pore structure on capillary and flow phenomena in sandstones[J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 1975,14(3):48-55.
[3]	Kozeny J . Ueber kapillare leitung des wasser in bodn, sitzungber[J]. Akad. Wiss. Wien, 1927,136(2a):271-306.
[4]	Carman P C . Fluid flow through granular beds[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 1997,75(1):S32-S48. doi: 10.1016/S0263-8762(97)80003-2
[5]	Ruth D, Lindsay C, Allen M . Combining electrical measurements and mercury porosimetry to predict permeability[J]. Petrophysics, 2013,54(6):531-537.
[6]	何更生, 唐海 . 油层物理[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2011.
[7]	张冲, 郭聪, 宋秋强 , 等. 利用压汞资料预测储层地层因素F的改进方法[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2016,45(4):747-753.

编号	进汞压力/ MPa	进汞饱和度, %	毛管压力平方的倒数/ （MPa）^-2	孔隙半径/ μm	毛细管半径/ μm	分布频率, %
1	0.029	0	1 189.060 6	0	0	0
2	0.045	0	493.827 2	0	0	0
3	0.074	0	182.615 0	0	0	0
4	0.119	0	70.616 5	0	0	0
5	0.210	0	22.675 7	0	0	0
6	0.285	0	12.311 5	0	0	0
7	0.470	0	4.526 9	0	0	0
8	0.726	0	1.897 3	0	0	0
9	1.179	1.467	0.719 4	0.629	0.629	1.467
10	1.790	8.854	0.312 1	0.415	0.522	7.388
11	2.826	30.193	0.125 2	0.263	0.339	21.338
12	4.543	46.029	0.048 5	0.163	0.213	15.836
13	7.321	55.243	0.018 7	0.101	0.132	9.214
14	11.844	64.695	0.007 1	0.063	0.082	9.452
15	18.117	76.032	0.003 0	0.041	0.052	11.338
16	28.060	85.484	0.001 3	0.026	0.034	9.452
17	45.322	92.544	0.000 5	0.016	0.021	7.060
18	73.343	94.587	0.000 2	0.010	0.013	2.043
19	118.276	95.784	0.000 1	0.006	0.008	1.197

不同毛细管孔隙度, %	不同毛细管渗透率/10^-3μm²	不同毛细管渗透率贡献率, %	不同半径毛细管体积/ cm³	单根毛细管体积/μm³	不同半径毛细管个数/个
0	0	0	0	0	0
0	0	0	0	0	0
0	0	0	0	0	0
0	0	0	0	0	0
0	0	0	0	0	0
0	0	0	0	0	0
0	0	0	0	0	0
0	0	0	0	0	0
0.18	3.59×10^-3	9.637	0.045	450 081.9	9.89×10⁴
0.91	1.24×10^-2	33.386	0.224	179 735.7	1.25×10⁶
2.64	1.51×10^-2	40.581	0.647	75 638.2	8.56×10⁶
1.96	4.44×10^-3	11.917	0.480	29 927.4	1.61×10⁷
1.14	9.98×10^-4	2.678	0.280	11 558.2	2.42×10⁷
1.17	3.93×10^-4	1.055	0.287	4 437.3	6.46×10⁷
1.40	1.88×10^-4	0.505	0.344	1 770.8	1.94×10⁸
1.17	6.64×10^-5	0.178	0.287	749.4	3.83×10⁸
0.87	2.00×10^-5	0.054	0.214	302.4	7.08×10⁸
0.25	2.22×10^-6	0.006	0.062	115.8	5.35×10⁸
0.15	4.97×10^-7	0.001	0.036	44.3	8.19×10⁸

[1]	LIANG Yunpei, ZHANG Huaijun, WANG Lichun, QIN Chaozhong, TIAN Jian, CHEN Qiang, SHI Bowen. Numerical simulation of flow fields and permeability evolution in real fractures under continuous loading stress [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(6): 834-843.
[2]	CHEN Minfeng,QIN Lifeng,ZHAO Kang,WANG Yiwen. Effective injection-production well spacing in pressure-sensitive reservoir with low permeability [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(6): 855-862.
[3]	ZHANG Fengxi, NIU Congcong, ZHANG Yichi. Evaluation of multi-stage fracturing a horizontal well of low permeability reservoirs in East China Sea [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 695-702.
[4]	HU Zhijian, LI Shuxin, WANG Jianjun, ZHOU Hong, ZHAO Yulong, ZHANG Liehui. Productivity evaluation of multi-stage fracturing horizontal wells in shale gas reservoir with complex artificial fracture occurrence [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 459-466.
[5]	LI Ying, MA Hansong, LI Haitao, GANZER Leonhard, TANG Zheng, LI Ke, LUO Hongwei. Dissolution of supercritical CO₂ on carbonate reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 288-295.
[6]	WANG Dianlin, YANG Qiong, WEI Bing, JI Bingxin, XIN Jun, SUN Lin. Effect of betaine surfactant structure on the properties of CO₂ foam film [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 313-321.
[7]	LIAO Songlin,XIA Yang,CUI Yinan,LIU Fangzhi,CAO Shengjiang,TANG Yong. Variation of crude oil properties with multi-cycle CO₂ huff-n-puff of horizontal wells in ultra-low permeability reservoir [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 784-793.
[8]	GUO Deming,PAN Yi,SUN Yang,CHAO Zhongtang,LI Xiaonan,CHENG Shisheng. EOR mechanism of viscosity reducer-CO₂ combined flooding in heavy oil reservoir with low permeability [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 794-802.
[9]	SHI Juntai,LI Wenbin,ZHANG Longlong,JI Changjiang,LI Guofu,ZHANG Sui'an. An inversion method of initial coal reservoir pressure using fracturing process data [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(4): 564-571.
[10]	ZHANG Si,PENG Xiaolong. Calculation method of critical desorption pressure in undersaturated CBM reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(4): 589-595.
[11]	YANG Zhaozhong,YUAN Jianfeng,ZHU Jingyi,LI Xiaogang,LI Yang,WANG Hao. Thermal injection stimulation to enhance coalbed methane recovery [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(4): 617-625.
[12]	ZHAO Baoyin,ZHANG Ming. Application of facies-controlled prestack geostatistical inversion method in high quality reservoir prediction of low permeability reservoir: A case study of V Oil Formation of Es₃³ in Block A [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(4): 666-676.
[13]	LIU Yulin,FAN Lingxiao,FANG Dazhi,PENG Yongmin,ZENG Lianbo,FENG Dongjun. Application of a new source-reservoir classification method in production analysis of shale gas wells in Eastern Sichuan [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(3): 429-436.
[14]	LI Chuxiong,SHEN Baojian,LU Longfei,JIANG Qigui,PAN Anyang,TAO Jinyu,DING Jianghui. Pore structure characterization of Shahezi Formation shale in Songliao Basin: Based on low-field nuclear magnetic resonance technology [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(3): 468-476.
[15]	FAN Lingling. Relation between macro-heterogeneity of reservoir and gas reservoir types of He-1 Member in eastern Hangjinqi [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(2): 274-284.

A new approach to establishing the capillary bundle model

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 7

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10