一种建立毛管束模型的新方法

Abstract

Abstract:

The capillary bundle model is one of the most common physical models for the porous media. The most classic physical model is the straight capillary bundle model with same diameter. But the bendability of the porous media is neglected in this physical model. Therefore, based on the tight sandstone, combined with the mercury data, and by the introduction of the correction factor-tortuosity, we put forward a new approach to establish the capillary bundle model. This approach considers the bendability of the capillary bundle model and can accurately calculate the radius of capillary, capillary porosity and permeability, capillary volume of different radius and permeability contribution of capillary bundle model with different radius. This new approach has great significance for the study of the reservoir fluid imbibition of specific pressure and quantitatively characterizing the water invasion reservoir damage.

Key words: physical model, capillary bundle model, capillary pressure, tortuosity, porosity, permeability

CLC Number:

TE122.2

Yuan Yuan,Yingfeng Meng,Hanlin Tang. A new approach to establishing the capillary bundle model[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2018, 8(3): 35-39.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Table 1

Fig. 3

Table 2

Fig. 4

Table 3

Fig. 5

References 7

[1]	Purcell W R . Capillary pressures-their measurement using mercury and the calculation of permeability therefrom[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1949,1(2):39-48. doi: 10.2118/949039-G
[2]	Dullien F A L . Effects of pore structure on capillary and flow phenomena in sandstones[J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 1975,14(3):48-55.
[3]	Kozeny J . Ueber kapillare leitung des wasser in bodn, sitzungber[J]. Akad. Wiss. Wien, 1927,136(2a):271-306.
[4]	Carman P C . Fluid flow through granular beds[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 1997,75(1):S32-S48. doi: 10.1016/S0263-8762(97)80003-2
[5]	Ruth D, Lindsay C, Allen M . Combining electrical measurements and mercury porosimetry to predict permeability[J]. Petrophysics, 2013,54(6):531-537.
[6]	何更生, 唐海 . 油层物理[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2011.
[7]	张冲, 郭聪, 宋秋强 , 等. 利用压汞资料预测储层地层因素F的改进方法[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2016,45(4):747-753.

编号	进汞压力/ MPa	进汞饱和度, %	毛管压力平方的倒数/ （MPa）^-2	孔隙半径/ μm	毛细管半径/ μm	分布频率, %
1	0.029	0	1 189.060 6	0	0	0
2	0.045	0	493.827 2	0	0	0
3	0.074	0	182.615 0	0	0	0
4	0.119	0	70.616 5	0	0	0
5	0.210	0	22.675 7	0	0	0
6	0.285	0	12.311 5	0	0	0
7	0.470	0	4.526 9	0	0	0
8	0.726	0	1.897 3	0	0	0
9	1.179	1.467	0.719 4	0.629	0.629	1.467
10	1.790	8.854	0.312 1	0.415	0.522	7.388
11	2.826	30.193	0.125 2	0.263	0.339	21.338
12	4.543	46.029	0.048 5	0.163	0.213	15.836
13	7.321	55.243	0.018 7	0.101	0.132	9.214
14	11.844	64.695	0.007 1	0.063	0.082	9.452
15	18.117	76.032	0.003 0	0.041	0.052	11.338
16	28.060	85.484	0.001 3	0.026	0.034	9.452
17	45.322	92.544	0.000 5	0.016	0.021	7.060
18	73.343	94.587	0.000 2	0.010	0.013	2.043
19	118.276	95.784	0.000 1	0.006	0.008	1.197

不同毛细管孔隙度, %	不同毛细管渗透率/10^-3μm²	不同毛细管渗透率贡献率, %	不同半径毛细管体积/ cm³	单根毛细管体积/μm³	不同半径毛细管个数/个
0	0	0	0	0	0
0	0	0	0	0	0
0	0	0	0	0	0
0	0	0	0	0	0
0	0	0	0	0	0
0	0	0	0	0	0
0	0	0	0	0	0
0	0	0	0	0	0
0.18	3.59×10^-3	9.637	0.045	450 081.9	9.89×10⁴
0.91	1.24×10^-2	33.386	0.224	179 735.7	1.25×10⁶
2.64	1.51×10^-2	40.581	0.647	75 638.2	8.56×10⁶
1.96	4.44×10^-3	11.917	0.480	29 927.4	1.61×10⁷
1.14	9.98×10^-4	2.678	0.280	11 558.2	2.42×10⁷
1.17	3.93×10^-4	1.055	0.287	4 437.3	6.46×10⁷
1.40	1.88×10^-4	0.505	0.344	1 770.8	1.94×10⁸
1.17	6.64×10^-5	0.178	0.287	749.4	3.83×10⁸
0.87	2.00×10^-5	0.054	0.214	302.4	7.08×10⁸
0.25	2.22×10^-6	0.006	0.062	115.8	5.35×10⁸
0.15	4.97×10^-7	0.001	0.036	44.3	8.19×10⁸

[1]	MA Xiaoli, BI Yongbin, JIANG Mingjie, LI Dan, GU Xiao. Characteristics of water phase permeability variation in medium-low permeability oil reservoirs during high multiple waterflooding [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2025, 15(1): 103-109.
[2]	MA Peishen, SUN Yili, SHU Zheng, TAN Yeqiang, YU Qiang, ZHANG Wei, WU Changhu, QI Yong. Study on variation in decline rate with water cut using relative permeability curves [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2025, 15(1): 110-115.
[3]	CUI Chuanzhi, SUI Yingfei, WANG Yidan, WU Zhongwei, LI Jing. Relative permeability model of polymer particle dispersed phase for oil displacement based on fractal theory [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2025, 15(1): 88-95.
[4]	JIA Junhong, YU Guangming, LI Shuman, XIE Zhen, PENG Rong, TANG Yong. Analysis of key controlling factors for water injection deficiency in low-permeability oil reservoirs: A case study of Chang-8 reservoir in Ordos Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(6): 892-898.
[5]	MIN Chao,LI Yingjun,LI Xiaogang,HUA Qing,ZHANG Na. Application of intuitive fuzzy MABAC method in optimizing favorable areas of low permeability carbonate gas reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(4): 577-585.
[6]	LI Zhongchao, QI Guixue, LUO Bobo, XU Xun, CHEN Hua. Gas flooding adaptability of deep low permeability condensate gas reservoir [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(3): 324-332.
[7]	TANG Yong, TANG Kai, XIA Guang, XU Di. Retrograde condensation pollution and removal method of BZ19-6 low permeability reservoir [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 102-107.
[8]	GUO Zhidong, KANG Yili, WANG Yubin, GU Linjiao, YOU Lijun, CHEN Mingjun, YAN Maoling. Gas-water relative permeability characteristics and production dynamic response of low pressure and high water cut tight gas reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 138-150.
[9]	SUN Yili. Mechanism of CO₂ injection to improve the water injection capacity of low permeability reservoir in Shuanghe Oilfield in Henan [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 55-63.
[10]	LIANG Yunpei, ZHANG Huaijun, WANG Lichun, QIN Chaozhong, TIAN Jian, CHEN Qiang, SHI Bowen. Numerical simulation of flow fields and permeability evolution in real fractures under continuous loading stress [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(6): 834-843.
[11]	CHEN Minfeng,QIN Lifeng,ZHAO Kang,WANG Yiwen. Effective injection-production well spacing in pressure-sensitive reservoir with low permeability [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(6): 855-862.
[12]	ZHANG Fengxi, NIU Congcong, ZHANG Yichi. Evaluation of multi-stage fracturing a horizontal well of low permeability reservoirs in East China Sea [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 695-702.
[13]	HU Zhijian, LI Shuxin, WANG Jianjun, ZHOU Hong, ZHAO Yulong, ZHANG Liehui. Productivity evaluation of multi-stage fracturing horizontal wells in shale gas reservoir with complex artificial fracture occurrence [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 459-466.
[14]	LI Ying, MA Hansong, LI Haitao, GANZER Leonhard, TANG Zheng, LI Ke, LUO Hongwei. Dissolution of supercritical CO₂ on carbonate reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 288-295.
[15]	WANG Dianlin, YANG Qiong, WEI Bing, JI Bingxin, XIN Jun, SUN Lin. Effect of betaine surfactant structure on the properties of CO₂ foam film [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 313-321.

A new approach to establishing the capillary bundle model

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 7

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0